Mageau v. Great Northern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After a new trial was ordered upon the former appeal (102 Minn. 399), the case was again tried before Watts, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the sum demanded. From an order granting defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
On September 12, 1906, plaintiff’s intestate, Mrs. Mageau, while a passenger on one of the trains of the Great Northern Railway, received certain injuries, the immediate result of which was the retroversion of the uterus. Some weeks thereafter she was successfully operated upon for this trouble. On February 5, 1907, Mrs. Mageau gave birth to a child. During the interval she had suffered from various troubles, and for some time had been in the hospital, where she was treated for bronchitis. The child had to be removed by means of instruments, and was dead when born. Five days after the birth…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mageau v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Frank Altrichter v. Shell Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Smith v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.