Legal Opinion

Rogers v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 19, 1991No. 326-89CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:

This military pay, record review, case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment.1 Jurisdiction is premised herein on 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)2 and 10 U.S.C. § 1552.3 The *678plaintiff, Edwin L. “Ted” Rogers, Jr., is a former serviceman who was given an involuntary honorable discharge from active duty in the United States Army in December 1982 for the reason that he was determined to be a “DRUG ABUSE-REHABILITATION FAILURE,” based on four previous 1982 positive urinalysis tests, three of which were later determined to be either legally or…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Gilligan v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Laningham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  2. Lee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  3. Longhofer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Vierrether v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
  5. Germano v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API