Legal Opinion
Germano v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 23, 1992No. 91-1179CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case is before the court after argument on defendant’s motion to dismiss and cross-motions for summary judgment. The issue is whether a naval reserve officer is entitled to reinstatement to active duty status after the termination of a minimum service obligation when the Secretary of the Navy has exercised his discretion to override a correction board’s decision recommending relief.
FACTS
The following facts derive from the administrative record. Brian R. Germano (“plaintiff”) enlisted in the United States Navy (the “Navy”) in October 1983. After having completed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Epstein v. GerenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Richey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Strickland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Thumser v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Wotowic-McGill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998