Legal Opinion
Teg-Paradigm Environmental, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 29, 2006No. 2006-5007PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
TEG-Paradigm Environmental, Inc. (“TEG”) entered into a contract with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). Pursuant to the contract, TEG agreed to perform asbestos abatement work at the Geneva Towers, an apartment complex, in San Francisco. After the contract work was completed, TEG submitted a claim to the contracting officer in which it sought an equitable adjustment in the contract price. In support of its claim, TEG asserted that it had been required to perform excessive cleaning and that it had been required to remove excessive…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- McAbee Construction, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Metric Constructors, Inc. v. National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Coast Federal Bank, Fsb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Castle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Dobyns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Daewoo Engineering and Const. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Shell Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.