Legal Opinion
Daewoo Engineering and Const. Co., Ltd. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 20, 2009No. 2007-5129PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Daewoo Engineering and Construction Co., Ltd. (“Daewoo” or “the contractor”) brought suit in the Court of Federal Claims, alleging that the United States breached a contract between Daewoo and the United States to build a road in the Republic of Palau. The United States counterclaimed, alleging violations of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, and the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 604, and seeking forfeiture of Daewoo’s claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2514. Daewoo Eng’g & Const. Co. v. United States, 73 Fed.Cl. 547, 597 (2006). The Court of Federal Claims held that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Reflectone, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Beta Systems, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Inserso Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Hernandez v. CauseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.