Legal Opinion

Travis v. Schnebly

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1912No. 9894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Garfield county, Canfield, J., entered February 10, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for a breach of promise.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

Action by Ida M. Travis against Andrew R. Schnebly, to recover damages for an alleged breach of prom*2ise to marry. From a judgment in her favor, the defendant has appealed.

Respondent alleged that in October, 1904, she and appellant promised to marry each other within a reasonable time; that she has been ready and willing to marry appellant; that in December, 1907, she made preparations for-their marriage ; that, at appellant’s request, postponements were made until the spring of 1908, and the fall of 1908, but that he failed and refused to marry her, though requested so-to do. Appellant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grover v. ZookWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Gring v. LerchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parks Ex Rel. Parks v. MarshallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  2. State v. SeymourNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Witt v. HeyenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Shepler v. ChamberlainMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Travis v. SchneblyWashington Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API