Legal Opinion
Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. State
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 9, 2006No. SC 17538PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
It is well settled that the plaintiff, the Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association (association), is not obligated to pay claims that are asserted for the benefit of an insurer, because such unpaid claims are not “covered claims” under the Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association Act (act), General Statutes § 38a-836 et seq. See, e.g., Doucette v. Pomes, 247 Conn. 442, 454-55, 724 A.2d 481 (1999). The association appeals1 from the declaratory judgment of the trial court rendered for the named defendant, the state of Connecticut (state), and claims that the trial court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Doucette v. PomesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Ferrari v. TotoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Hunnihan v. Mattatuck Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Potvin v. Lincoln Service & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Alvord Investment, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Walsh v. JodoinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Small v. Going Forward, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. DrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.