Mechanical Contractors Ass'n of Cincinnati, Inc. v. University of Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Tyack, Judge.
The University of Cincinnati, defendant in this action, wanted to have a conference center built on land it purchased for that purpose. The university concedes that if it had used appropriated funds to finance direct construction of the conference center, it would have been required to follow R.C. Chapter 153, which provides competitive bidding rules for certain public projects.
The university, however, chose an alternative method for funding and developing the conference center, at an ultimate cost in excess of $60,000,000. On December 1, 1996, the university leased the land it…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Grady v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Mergenthal v. Star Banc Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Helton v. Scioto County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Planned Parenthood Asss'n v. Project JerichoOhio Supreme Court · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Affiliated Construction Trades Foundation v. University of West Virginia Board of TrusteesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- Columbus v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Mechanical Contractors Ass'n v. University of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Brasi Development Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- McHenry v. McHenryOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.