Legal Opinion
Advanced Power Systems, Inc. v. Hi-Tech Systems, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 3, 1992No. Civ. 90-7952PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
This action presents competing claims between two vendors of battery power systems for telecommunications, computers, and machinery. Plaintiff Advanced Power Systems, Inc. (“APS”) was formed in 1989 by two former employees of defendant Hi-Tech Systems, Inc. (“Hi-Tech”), Gregory Presson and James McDevitt. These companies are now direct competitors. APS filed suit against Hi-Tech and its principals, claiming that they engaged in a series of activities designed to undermine APS’s operations and competitiveness. The complaint included various state law…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Singletary v. Pennsylvania Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Zachair, Ltd. v. DriggsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Sidney Lundy Claire Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc., T/a Trop World, Defendant/third Party v. Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, Individually Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, a Professional Association, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. Roussel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.