Legal Opinion

The Bradbury Co., Inc. v. Teissier-Ducros

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 31, 2005No. 03-1391-WEBPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WESLEY E. BROWN, Senior District Judge.

Now before the Court are the motions to dismiss under the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) by the following counter defendants: American Machine & Rollform Tech, Inc. (American), Hayes International (Hayes), Marion Die & Fixture (Marion), and Beck Automation (Beck). The Court has jurisdiction over this case under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and it is not disputed.

Counter defendants are manufacturers who employed counter plaintiffs as consultants. A contract was signed in 1999 but the business relationship ended in 2001.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Sutton v. Utah State School for the Deaf & BlindCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. San Francisco Residence Club, Inc. v. Baswell-GuthrieDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012
  2. Rand Construction Co. v. Dearborn Mid-West Conveyor Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2013
  3. In Re Rolling Thunder Gas Gathering, L.L.C.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2006
  4. Ireland v. DodsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
  5. Staples v. H Walker Enterprises LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API