Legal Opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 21, 2014No. Case No. 12cv744 BTM (DHB)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT FOSTER WHEELER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, Chief Judge.
Defendant Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (“Foster Wheeler”) has moved for Summary Judgment against Plaintiffs. (Doc. 229). For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Donald Willis was allegedly exposed to asbestos while serving in the United States Navy between 1959 and 1980 as a result of his work with asbestos-containing products. (Doc. 291, First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) ¶ 2; exs. A, C). Defendant…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Hodsdon v. Mars, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Whelan v. Armstrong Int'l Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- ARTHUR G. WHELAN VS. ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC. (L-7161-12, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- Chapman v. Walmart Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.