Legal Opinion
Adams v. Loffland Brothers Drilling Company
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 25, 1970No. 479PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Defendants appeal a total disability judgment in favor of plaintiff in a Workmen’s Compensation action. We affirm.
I. Defendánts contend that Finding, of Fact 6, which states that, “Plaintiff, by reason of the injuries sustained by him is wholly unable to perform the usual tasks in the work he was performing at the time of his injury, and is wholly unable to perform any work for which he is fitted by reason of age, education, training, general physical and mental capacity and previous work experience[,]” is wholly without evidentiary support. However, defendants state…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ortega v. New Mexico State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Quintana v. Trotz Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Winford Leo Evans v. Stearns-Roger Manufacturing Co., Employer and Standard Accident Insurance Co., InsurerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Roybal v. County of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Lopez v. Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Fryar v. JohnsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Three Rivers Land Co., Inc. v. MaddouxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- Medina v. Zia CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Marez v. Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.