Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Overton

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 1984No. B002984PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) appeals from a judgment declaring Allstate is obligated to provide a defense for its insured William Overton (Overton) in a personal injury action filed by David Lane (Lane). The issue posed is whether the mere fact of Overton’s conviction of misdemeanor battery arising out of the incident that is the subject of Lane’s action conclusively relieves Allstate of its duties to defend and indemnify Overton. We answer this question in the negative and affirm.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Allstate instituted an action for declaratory relief (Code…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. RochaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. ColantuonoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Merced Mutual Insurance v. MendezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Royal Globe Insurance v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Fire Insurance Exchange v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API