Allstate Insurance v. Overton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) appeals from a judgment declaring Allstate is obligated to provide a defense for its insured William Overton (Overton) in a personal injury action filed by David Lane (Lane). The issue posed is whether the mere fact of Overton’s conviction of misdemeanor battery arising out of the incident that is the subject of Lane’s action conclusively relieves Allstate of its duties to defend and indemnify Overton. We answer this question in the negative and affirm.
Facts and Proceedings Below
Allstate instituted an action for declaratory relief (Code…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. RochaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- People v. ColantuonoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Merced Mutual Insurance v. MendezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Royal Globe Insurance v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.