Legal Opinion

State v. Rawls

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 2010No. COA09-1029PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Defendant Preston Teion Rawls appeals from his conviction of one count of felony breaking and entering. Defendant primarily argues that the trial court, when denying his motion to suppress the victim’s pretrial identification, erroneously concluded that N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-284.52 (2009), the Eyewitness Identification Reform Act (“the EIRA”), does not apply to showup identifications. We agree with the trial court. After reviewing the EIRA as a whole, considering our courts’ prior decisions distinguishing showups from lineups, and noting the fact that defendant’s argument would…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Electric Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Electrical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Johnson v. Covil Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. State v. HarvellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API