Legal Opinion
Erickson v. Boothe
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 1954No. Civ. 8374PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
This ease is before this court for the fifth time —in this instance by virtue of plaintiff’s appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant awarding him certain amounts representing the sums due him for the period he was dispossessed by plaintiff of the ranch involved in the litigation.
Originally plaintiff by an action for declaratory relief sought to determine whether defendant as lessee had effectively exercised an option to “re-lease” the property under the terms of a lease contract. A judgment in favor of plaintiff, as executrix, was reversed on appeal. (Erickson v. Boothe, 79 Cal.App.2d…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gore v. BingamanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Ward v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Erickson v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- City of Oakland v. ButeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Munoz v. MacMillanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Psm Holding Corp. v. National Farm Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Flood v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Majors v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Wood v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.