Legal Opinion
Neary v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 27, 2007No. 3:06cv536 (JBA)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. #88] AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED AS A COLLECTIVE ACTION AND FOR RELATED RELIEF [DOC. # 33/35]
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff James Neary instituted this action on behalf of himself and other similarly situated individuals, “i.e., Field Adjusters, Field Appraisers, and/or Outside Adjusters,” against his employer, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”), alleging failure to pay overtime compensation in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), and asserting,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Joanie Dybach v. State of Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Jackson v. Motel 6 Multipurpose, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cohen v. Gerson Lehrman Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Davis v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Amendola v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Bifulco v. Mortgage Zone, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Raniere v. Citigroup Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.