Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Stockmens Bank & Trust Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1987No. 87-3PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The question posed in this case is whether a judgment debtor who claims an exemption from execution with respect to funds in a joint bank account must assume the burden of establishing entitlement to the exemption. Confronted with a claim that funds in a joint bank account were exempt from execution under § 1-17-411, W.S. 1977, Cum.Supp.1986, 1 the district court ruled that only a small portion of the funds were exempt from execution. Rick D. Hancock urges that the evidence is insuffi cient to support the trial court’s conclusion that the funds were not exempt. We hold that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. First National Bank v. FordWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Selma, Rome & Dalton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Texas Gulf Sulphur Company v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hydaburg Cooperative Ass'n v. Hydaburg FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Savig v. First National Bank of OmahaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. S & S Diversified Services, L.L.C. v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1995
  4. Hydaburg Cooperative Ass'n v. Hydaburg FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Morgan Stanley & Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API