Legal Opinion
Savig v. First National Bank of Omaha
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 22, 2010No. A09-1221PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
This case requires us to answer certified questions of law concerning the interplay between Minnesota’s garnishment statutes, MinmStat. §§ 571.71 to 571.932 (2008), and Minnesota’s Multiparty Accounts Act (MPAA), Minn.Stat. §§ 524.6-201 to 524.6-214 (2008), and to determine who has the burden of proving net contributions to a joint checking account during a post-judgment garnishment proceeding.
A default judgment was entered against plaintiff Mona Savig for failure to make credit card payments to defendant First National Bank of Omaha. On First National’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re UnitedHealth Group Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Hayden v. GardnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tracy Lind v. Midland Funding, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Conga Corporation, d/b/a Conga Latin Bistro v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Morgan Stanley & Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- In re Beachside I Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.