Legal Opinion

Womack v. San Francisco Community College District

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 2007No. A112564PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAERLE, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for a writ of mandate brought pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1085. By that petition, he sought to compel respondents to reinstate him as a regular employee in the respondent San Francisco Community College District’s (hereafter District) English as a second language (ESL) department on the basis that the prior level of his work in that department had altered his status from that of a “temporary employee” to one of a “contract employee” who could not be terminated in the manner or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Upland Police Officers Ass'n v. City of UplandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Kreeft v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Adelman v. Associated Internat. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Oakland v. Oakland Police & Fire Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Hazard v. East Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  3. Schellinger Brothers v. City of SebastopolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. SJCBC LLC v. HorwedelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Sullivan v. Centinela Valley Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API