Legal Opinion

Hazard v. East Hills, Inc.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 6, 2012No. 2011-316-AppealPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GOLDBERG,

for the Court.

This case takes us to the picturesque Matunuck Hills section of the Town of South Kingstown. The plaintiff, Laurel Y. Hazard (plaintiff or Laurel Hazard), 1 appeals from the grant of a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendant, East Hills, Inc. (defendant or East Hills), 2 declaring that the plaintiff is barred by the doctrine of laches from prosecuting a claim of ownership to an undeveloped eight-acre tract of land (8-Acre Parcel or disputed parcel) in South Kingstown, Rhode Island and finding that the defendant had established ownership of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Spirit Rent-A-Car, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  2. Chase v. ChaseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1897
  3. Rodriques v. SantosSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  4. Delta Airlines, Inc. v. NearySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  5. O'REILLY v. Town of GlocesterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cecilia Cigarrilha v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  2. Butterfly Realty v. James Romanella & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
  3. Argelis Pichardo v. Julie StevensSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  4. Wenda Branson v. Marion P. Louttit, individually and in her capacities as Trustee of the Augusta P. Hathaway Living Trust and Custodian for Jonathan H. Louttit, II and Caroline Hathaway Louttit, minor childrenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
  5. Nellie S. Francis v. Dr. James A. GalloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API