Legal Opinion

In Re Last Will & Testament of Love

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoice, J.

Our statute on the subject, O. S., sec. 4133, provides in effect that no will or testament in writing, or any clause thereof, shall be revoked, except by burning, cancelling, tearing or obliterating the same, by the testator himself, or in his presence and by his direction and consent, or by a formal will with witnesses or a holograph will, duly executed as- the statute requires and prescribes.

In construing this statute, it is held with us that in any of the modes specified there may be a partial revocation of the will. In re Will of Saunders, 177 N. C., 156; Baker v. Edge, 174 N. C., 100;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wolf v. BollingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Cutler v. Cutler.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. In Re Will of WellbornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Baker v. . EdgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. In Re Will of SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wells v. PurcellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. In Re the Last Will & Testament of RoedigerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Schneider v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  4. In Re Will of GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Hyatt v. . HyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API