Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. . Hyatt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

Tbe usual issue was submitted to tbe jury- — devisavit vel non: “Is tbe paper-writing offered by tbe propounder, or any part thereof, and if so, what part, the last will and testament of the said John B. Hyatt, deceased?” The jury answered the issue, “Yes, every part of it.”

Plaintiffs, caveators, assign the following errors:

“No. 1 is addressed to the refusal of the court to admit in evidence, for the purpose which they were offered, the letters from the alleged testator, John B. Hyatt, to Mrs. W. A. Whitner, and the accompanying envelope, as identified by the witnesses; and the caveators…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clary's Administrators v. ClarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
  2. Bost v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. McLeary v. . NormentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. In Re Daniel Burns' WillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. In Re Will of RawlingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Will of PuettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. In Re the Will of McCauleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. In Re the Will of KempSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Edgar v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. In Re the Last Will & Testament of CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API