In Re Will of Saunders
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by caveators from Whedbee, at November Term, 1918, of GRAVEN.
1Opinion of the Court
Claek, O. J.
The will of tbe testatrix bas been probated, both in common and solemn form. Tbe only question presented was as to-whether certain words which had been erased with pen and ink were erased by the testatrix or some one else at her request, or whether it was. done without authority. When the will was opened the erasures were in the will. There was testimony that the testatrix had told the witness that these names had been marked out by her, and that the propounders,, her daughter and her grandson, would get all the property.
The exceptions are solely to-the competency of the grandson…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. Cameron.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Cox v. Beaufort County Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Sawyer v. . GrandySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Armfield v. . ColvertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Bonner v. Stotesbury.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jones v. WaldroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Jones v. . WaldroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Hull v. CartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re Estate of CablerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- In Re Last Will & Testament of LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.