Hershey v. Bristol
California Supreme Court
'APPEAL from an order of the Superior. Court of Los Angeles County refusing a motion to vacate an order for the issuance of a Writ of Assistance and to recall the writ. Charles Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion óf the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to vacate an order for the issuance of a writ of assistance and to recall the writ. The transcript contains no bill of exceptions, nor are the papers contained in it authenticated as “the papers and evidence used or taken on the hearing of the motion” in any other way as required by rule XXIX, [144 Cal. lii, 119 Pac. xiv], of this court. “Unautlienticated papers in a transcript in which there is no bill of exceptions constitute no part of a record which can be considered on appeal.” (Nash v. Harris, 57 Cal. 242; Herrlich v. McDonald,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Nash v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Power v. FairbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Skinner v. HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Collins v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Knox v. SchragCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Credit Clearance Bureau v. Weary & Alford Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912