Legal Opinion
Gibson v. Mohawk Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 15, 1982No. Nos. 81-2035, 81-2084PublishedCited by 165 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
Mohawk Rubber Company appeals from the district court’s1 judgment, 521 F.Supp. 1285 (E.D.Ark.1981), awarding Richard Gibson $194,376.74 in damages because the company discharged him in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. Gibson cross-appeals from the district court’s denial of his request for certain equitable relief. We reverse and remand for a new trial to determine the damages to which Gibson is appropriately entitled.
I
FACTS.
Mohawk Rubber Company, headquartered in Hudson, Ohio, is primarily a producer of tire and rubber…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by165 opinions
- John D. Starceski, at No. 94-3208 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, at No. 94-3182Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Jaime Blum, Brij Kapur and James C. Spitsbergen, in 86-5349 v. Witco Chemical Corporation, in 86-5310Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Jose L. Sanchez v. Puerto Rico Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Marjorie Reichman v. Bonsignore, Brignati & Mazzotta P.C. Bonsignore, Brignati & Mazzotta P.C. Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Duke v. Uniroyal Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.