Legal Opinion

Dehghanighanatghestani v. Mesquita

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 22, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2022-2595Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAHZIAR DEHGHANIGHANATGHESTANI, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-2595 (CKK) v. MARIO MESQUITA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 22, 2022) Plaintiff Mahziar Dehghanighanatghestani is a selectee of the Diversity Visa Lottery for the 2022 fiscal year. By statute, his eligibility to receive a diversity visa expires on September 30, 2022. Plaintiff was interviewed by a consular officer at the United States Embassy in Vienna, Austria on July 26, 2022, but subsequently received notice that his visa petition was “refused” under…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API