Pacific American Leasing Corp. v. S.P.E. Building Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Judge.
The issues in this appeal involve the enforceability of an equipment leasing agreement entered into by two business entities, in which the lessor disclaimed all responsibility for the suitability or performance of the equipment.
S.P.E. Building Systems, Inc. (Building Systems) sought a computer system to automate and integrate various business operations. Building Systems contacted CSS Company (CSS), a distributor of Cado Computer Systems (Cado), after seeing an advertisement for Cado equipment in a professional journal. CSS sent brochures to Building Systems describing…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- In re Estate of FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Johnson v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
- Seekings v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Industralease Automated & Scientific Equipment Corp. v. R. M. E. Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Phoenix Baptist Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Estate of Nelson v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Angus Medical Co. v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- U.S. Roofing, Inc. v. Credit Alliance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Powers v. Lycoming EnginesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.