Estate of Nelson v. Rice
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 Plaintiff/appellant the Estate of Martha Nelson, through its copersonal representatives Edward Franz and Kenneth Newman, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendants/appellees Carl and Anne Rice in the Estate’s action seeking rescission or reformation of the sale of two paintings to the Rices. The Estate argues that these remedies are required because the sale was based upon a mutual mistake. The Estate also contends that enforcing the sale “contract” would be unconscionable. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
¶ 2 We view the evidence and all…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Maxwell v. Fidelity Financial Services, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Hill-Shafer Partnership v. Chilson Family TrustArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Pacific Rent-All, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Phoenix Baptist Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Steinberger v. McVeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Bank of Ny v. DodevCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Clark v. Renaissance West, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Coup v. Scottsdale Plaza Resort, LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
- Romero v. Southwest AmbulanceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.