Legal Opinion

Roman v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 5, 1981No. 1 CA-UB 184PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Presiding Judge.

Appellant Adeline M. Roman filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits on June 3, 1980, to which appellant’s former employer filed a protest. A deputy with the Department of Economic Security (DES) ruled that appellant was disqualified for unemployment compensation because she had left work voluntarily without good cause in connection with her work. Appellant then filed a timely appeal of the deputy’s determination and a hearing was held before the Appeal Tribunal of the DES. The Appeal Tribunal upheld the determination of the deputy in a written decision…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Parsons v. Bekins FreightArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Gibson v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Ferguson v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rivera v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Holler v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Epstein v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  4. Iphaar v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. Northland Pioneer College v. ZarcoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API