Epstein v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Judge.
In this special action review of an Industrial Commission award, we must determine whether the administrative law judge erred in dismissing the petitioner employee’s (claimant’s) untimely request for hearing. The evidence demonstrated and the administrative law judge found that neither claimant nor his attorney received a copy of the notice of claim status denying a petition to reopen. The administrative law judge therefore found that claimant met the requirements of A.R.S. § 23-947(B)(3), which excuses a late filing. However, the administrative law judge further found…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Parsons v. Bekins FreightArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Lake Havasu City v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Van Horn v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- Hale's Estate v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Cowan v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RazoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Aldrich v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Epstein's Custom Carpentry v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Gonzalez v. interstate/xl SpecialtyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Sambrano v. Kr CapitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.