Gallegos v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WATSON, J.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the beneficiary in a policy of life insurance.
The material facts here stated have been extracted from the findings or from appellant’s statement.
On April 28, 1926, appellant’s soliciting agent took from the assured, appellee’s wife, an application and a “supplementary application-or non-medical declaration,” upon appellant’s printed forms. He told her that no medical examination was necessary; supposing at the time that he could procure insurance for her on the “non-medical” plan. Discovering later that married women…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. FreedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Goldstone v. Columbia Life & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Globe Reserve Mutual Life Insurance v. DuffyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Griego v. New York Life Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Turner v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1933