Legal Opinion

Turner v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1933No. 5807PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, J. —

October 7, 1929, appellant issued to respondent its so-called “Non-Cancellable” income policy, providing indemnity for loss of life or time through accidental means, or loss of time by sickness.

July 3, 1930, appellant sought to cancel the policy because of claimed misstatements in the written application and medical examination attached to the policy and' made part of it, and this suit was instituted to recover $900 with interest, for total loss of time due to sickness from April 14 to September 15, 1930.

Both appellant and respondent have discussed the word “Non-Cancellable” on…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Welch v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Suravitz v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Molstead v. Reliance National Life Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Wardle v. International Health & Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API