Legal Opinion
Hanley v. Sweeny
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 6, 1901No. 615PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the District of Idaho.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
This was a suit in equity, brought by the appellant, as complainant, to obtain a decree annulling two certain deeds made to the defendants Charles Sweeny and F. Lewis Clark, —one by the administrator of the estate of one David McKelvey, deceased, under an order made in a proceeding in mandamus, for an undivided one-third interest in the Skookum mine, situated in Shoshone county, Idaho; and the other by the complainant himself to the defendants Sweeny and Clark for an undivided one-eighth interest in the same mine. The complainant also, by his bill, asked for a.n accounting…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Chemung Mining Co. v. CunninghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hurt v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Sweeney v. HanleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. HanleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
- Chemung Mining Co. v. HanleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
- Hanley v. BeattyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902