Legal Opinion

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Bonetti

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1996No. 95-1667PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and (6). We also agree with the sanction recommended by the board. Respondent is therefore suspended for two years from the practice of law in Ohio; however, we suspend both years of the sanction period and place respondent on probation under the conditions established by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Akron Bar Ass'n v. MeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Akron Bar Ass'n v. BonettiOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Akron Bar Assn. v. BonettiOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Akron Bar Assn. v. BonettiOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Akron Bar Assn. v. MeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1999