Cusick v. Boyne
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. M. C. Sloss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.
This action was brought for legal services rendered by plaintiff’s assignor, as attorney at law, for defendant, at her special instance and request, between the second day of January and the twelfth day of September, 1901.
The ease was tried with a jury, and a verdict rendered for plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred dollars.
Defendant made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and she brings this appeal from the judgment and order denying her motion.
There is sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict, and no question is made in that regard. Defendant urges certain alleged errors which…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Lacy Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Crown Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Lazzarevich v. LazzarevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Crane v. StansburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Murphy v. National Ice Cream Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Miller v. CranstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.