Ryner v. Duke
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Justice.
“Verdicts are to have a reasonable intendment, and are to receive a reasonable construction, and are not to be avoided unless from necessity.” Code, § 110-105. “While it has been held that the construction of a verdict may be aided by a consideration of the pleadings, and that all the undisputed facts proved upon the trial may be examined and considered in construing the verdict (Mayor &c. of Macon v. Harris, 75 Ga. 761; Davis v. Tucker, 140 Ga. 240 (1), 243, 78 S. E. 909; Landrum v. Rivers, 148 Ga. 774 (9), 98 S. E. 477), this rule of construction is to be resorted to only…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fowler v. Southern Airlines Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Warren v. RushingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Landrum v. RiversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Mayor of Macon v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- McCrary v. GanoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- King Cotton, Ltd. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Thompson v. IngramSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Chitty v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Rylee v. AbernathySupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Henry v. MannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.