Legal Opinion

Ryner v. Duke

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 11, 1949No. 16638PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

“Verdicts are to have a reasonable intendment, and are to receive a reasonable construction, and are not to be avoided unless from necessity.” Code, § 110-105. “While it has been held that the construction of a verdict may be aided by a consideration of the pleadings, and that all the undisputed facts proved upon the trial may be examined and considered in construing the verdict (Mayor &c. of Macon v. Harris, 75 Ga. 761; Davis v. Tucker, 140 Ga. 240 (1), 243, 78 S. E. 909; Landrum v. Rivers, 148 Ga. 774 (9), 98 S. E. 477), this rule of construction is to be resorted to only…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Southern Airlines Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Warren v. RushingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Landrum v. RiversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. Mayor of Macon v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  5. McCrary v. GanoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. King Cotton, Ltd. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Thompson v. IngramSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  3. Chitty v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  4. Rylee v. AbernathySupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  5. Henry v. MannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API