Rylee v. Abernathy
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
1. In all actions to cancel deeds to land, the grantor and grantee therein are necessary parties. Taylor v. Colley, 138 Ga. 41 (74 S. E. 694); Kehr v. Floyd & Co., 132 Ga. 626 (64 S. E. 673); Brown v. Wilcox, 147 Ga. 546 (94 S. E. 993); Linder v. Ponder, 209 Ga. 746 (75 S. E. 2d 814). Hence the court did not err in directing the jury that, under the evidence, the pleadings, and the law, the court has jurisdiction of Mrs. Chestalet Rylee and to disregard her plea to the jurisdiction. See Code (Ann.) §§ 2-4904, 2-4903; Code § 3-204; Fowler v. Southern Airlines, 192 Ga.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fowler v. Southern Airlines Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Taylor v. ColleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Harrison v. HolsenbeckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Brown v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Allen v. BemisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bloodworth v. BloodworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- I. Perlis & Sons v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Miron Motel, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Hayes v. HayesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Henton v. GouldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.