Legal Opinion

Stoudamire v. State of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 1, 2006No. 2 CA-CV 2006-0018PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Damon Stoudamire appeals from the Pima County Superior Court’s denial of relief in his special action challenging the Pima County Justice Court’s denial of his request for a jury trial on marijuana and drug paraphernalia possession charges. Stoudamire argues the superior court erred in denying relief because he is entitled to a jury trial under the Organic Act, 48 U.S.C. § 1464, and the Arizona Constitution; he is entitled to a jury trial because he is charged with offenses the legislature considers serious; and the justice court’s denial of his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. WallArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fushek v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. Le NobleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Hornbeck v. LuskCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. BUCCELLATO v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Home Builders Ass'n v. City of GoodyearCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API