Legal Opinion

BUCCELLATO v. Morgan

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 4, 2008No. 1 CA-CV 07-0652PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellants appeal from the superior court’s denial of their consolidated special action, in which they asked the court to reverse the Scottsdale City Court’s determination that they are not entitled to a jury trial. For the following reasons, we affirm the superior court’s order and remand these matters to the Scottsdale City Court for bench trials.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Appellants are employed by Skin, a Scottsdale business featuring live exotic dance entertainment. Appellants Buccellato, Lopez, Pascoe, Daniels, Thomas, Neang, Dunbar, Robinson, Borum,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Bruce v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. McDougall v. StrohsonArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Fushek v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Oscar Pena TrujilloArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. Hon kalauli/krollCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  3. Spence v. BacalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. State of Arizona v. Daniel DiazCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API