Legal Opinion

State v. Wall

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 2006No. CR-05-0089-PRPublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERCH, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 This case concerns the trial court’s refusal to give a lesser-included offense instruction requested by a defendant who had asserted an all-or-nothing defense. We conclude that a defendant does not forfeit his right to a lesser-included offense instruction by asserting an all-or-nothing defense if the evidence in the record is sufficient to support the instruction. We therefore reverse the judgment of conviction, vacate the decision of the court of appeals, and remand the case for retrial.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 On July 7, 2003, Emmet Wall,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. State v. SalazarArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. State v. SwoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. State v. BearupArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. HargraveArizona Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. AndrianoArizona Supreme Court · 2007

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API