Fushek v. State
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Justice.
¶ 1 This case requires us to decide whether the Arizona Constitution guarantees a jury trial to a misdemeanor defendant when the State files a special allegation of sexual motivation pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 13-118 (2001).
I
¶ 2 In November 2005, the Maricopa County Attorney filed a complaint in the San Tan Justice Court alleging that Dale Joseph Fushek had committed ten misdemeanors. The State also filed a special allegation of sexual motivation pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-118 1 for each alleged offense. If the trier of fact finds sexual motivation,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. StummerArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State of Arizona v. Oscar Pena TrujilloArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- State of Arizona v. Anthony Connue SerranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.