Legal Opinion

Fushek v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2008No. CV-07-0251-PRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HURWITZ, Justice.

¶ 1 This case requires us to decide whether the Arizona Constitution guarantees a jury trial to a misdemeanor defendant when the State files a special allegation of sexual motivation pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 13-118 (2001).

I

¶ 2 In November 2005, the Maricopa County Attorney filed a complaint in the San Tan Justice Court alleging that Dale Joseph Fushek had committed ten misdemeanors. The State also filed a special allegation of sexual motivation pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-118 1 for each alleged offense. If the trier of fact finds sexual motivation,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. StummerArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. State of Arizona v. Oscar Pena TrujilloArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State of Arizona v. Anthony Connue SerranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API