Rubbermaid Inc. v. Contico International, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WANGELIN, District Judge.
This matter was tried to the Court without a jury and the Court has been duly advised by testimony, documentary evidence and briefs of all the parties and makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
This is an action for infringement of a patent brought pursuant to the Patent Act, Title 35, United States Code. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Section 1338 and 2201. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. Section 1400(b). Plaintiff is a Ohio corporation having its principal place of business at Wooster, Ohio. Plaintiff is the assignee of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McCLURG v. KINGSLANDSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Brogdex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982