Legal Opinion
Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 3, 1982No. Civ. A. 76-793-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO AMEND FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND JUDGMENT
SKINNER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs have moved to amend the court’s Findings, Rulings and Order of June 12, 1981. Some of these proposed amendments correct predictable technical errors by the court and these have been adopted. Others go to the substance of findings, for some of which I have found support in the evidence, but some of which appear to add findings not expressly dealt with during the trial. The detailed resolution of these proposed amendments are as follows:
1. My memory of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Milgo Electronic Corporation, a Florida Corporation v. United Business Communications, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Ellipse Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Ford Motor Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Chemical Construction Corporation v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, Chemical Construction Corporation v. Jones & Laughlin Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Spray-Bilt, Inc. And David H. Richman v. Ingersoll-Rand World Trade, Limited, and Rand Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Codex Corporation v. Milgo Electronic Corporation, Codex Corporation v. Milgo Electronic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United Business Communications, Inc. v. Racal-Milgo, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1984
- Rixon Inc. v. Racal-Milgo, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982