Commonwealth v. Fisher
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice EAKIN.
In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether conspiracy to commit third degree murder is a cognizable offense under Pennsylvania law. Because we hold conspiracy to commit third degree murder is a cognizable offense, we reverse the order of the Superior Court and remand for reinstatement of the sentences.
Appellees Fisher, Stanton, and Best were teenagers at the time of the offense. They traveled to downtown Philadelphia with two other male cohorts to get one young man’s cell phone fixed. When that plan fell through, the group decided to “jump” the next person they…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Commonwealth v. EilandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. RiosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Commonwealth v. VargasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. CrosleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. WindsloweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. PackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- United States v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.