Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 2013PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether conspiracy to commit third degree murder is a cognizable offense under Pennsylvania law. Because we hold conspiracy to commit third degree murder is a cognizable offense, we reverse the order of the Superior Court and remand for reinstatement of the sentences.

Appellees Fisher, Stanton, and Best were teenagers at the time of the offense. They traveled to downtown Philadelphia with two other male cohorts to get one young man’s cell phone fixed. When that plan fell through, the group decided to “jump” the next person they…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  2. Commonwealth v. EilandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. RiosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VargasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. CrosleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. WindsloweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Commonwealth v. PackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. United States v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API