Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Packer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 2017No. 114 MAP 2016PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JUSTICE DONOHUE

With the emergence of the use of new, powerful and immediate intoxicants, we granted allowance of appeal to reaffirm long established distinctions between ordinary recklessness and malice in the context of a death or serious bodily injury caused by driving under the influence of alcohol and/or a controlled substance. In the case before us, Matthew Snyder was killed in an automobile collision caused by Danielle Nicole Packer, who inhaled (or “huffed”) difluoroethane (“DFE”)1 imme*163diately before and while operating her vehicle. Based on Packer’s history of losing…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  2. Commonwealth v. DunphySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. Woodard, A., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. Cash, O., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Joseph Wallace v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  2. In The Interest of J.B. Appeal of: J.B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. HoffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Com. v. Hernandez, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Peck, M., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API