E. H. Boly & Son, Inc. v. C. Richard Schneider
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before CHAMBERS and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District Judge. JAMESON, District Judge:
This is a diversity action for breach of contract. 1 Plaintiff-appellee, E. H. Boly & Son, Inc. (Boly) and defendant-appellant, C. Richard Schneider, entered into a written contract whereby Boly agreed to act as exclusive agent for Schneider in reselling an apartment complex after it had been converted into condominium units. In a non-jury trial the district court found that appellant had breached the contract and awarded appellee restitution of $30,000, plus interest from the date of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- John Joseph Mull v. Ford Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Bernstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. OlveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Mohr v. LearOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Bollenback v. Continental Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by23 opinions
- Interbank Investments, LLC v. Eagle River Water & Sanitation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- M. K. Transport, Inc. v. GroverIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- James B. Lansing Sound, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Interbank Investments, L.L.C. v. Vail Valley Consolidated Water DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Warwick Dev. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.