Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 23, 1958No. Nos. 5704, 5705PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a civil judgment in a suit by the United States against the appellants and others under the fraud provisions of the Surplus Property Act of 1944, 58 Stat. 765, 780, now Section 209(b), Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, 63 Stat. 377, 392, 40 U.S.C.A. § 489(b).

On the critical dates of the complaint, Section 26(b) of the 1944 Act provided in substance that every person who engages in any fraudulent scheme or device for the purpose of securing or obtaining any surplus property of the United States, or who agrees or conspires to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Rex Trailer Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Stanley F. Taylor v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Three Rivers Land Co., Inc. v. MaddouxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Capitol Fish CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. M. K. Transport, Inc. v. GroverIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Giron v. Housing Auth. of City of OpelousasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API