Legal Opinion

Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Olvera

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1941No. 9594PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

These are consolidated appeals from a judgment upon a verdict awarding damages to America Olvera, hereafter called Olvera, for injuries to her while performing as a trapeze artist, against each of two circus corporations, Ringling Bros.-Barnum & *585Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., hereafter called Ringling, and Al. G. Barnes Amusement Company, hereafter called Barnes.

Olvera, in Florida,,entered into a contract with Ringling by which she agreed, as an independent contractor, to give her performances as a trapeze artist in Ringling’s and other circuses. Among other agreements it…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Boseman v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Santa Fe, Prescott & Phœnix Railway Co. v. Grant Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Cumberland & Allegheny Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Jacksonville Terminal Company v. Railway Express Agency, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. Davis v. Fire Creek Fuel CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Fire Association of Phila. v. Allis Chalmers Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
  5. Thomas v. Atlantic Coast Line R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API