Legal Opinion

Turpen v. Booth

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,866PublishedCited by 62 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the defendants, in the Fifth District Court, County of Stanislaus. Booker, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Morrison, C. J.:

The complaint in this case avers, that in the month of March," 1877, the defendants, and each of them, were duly, legally, and in the manner and form prescribed by law, regularly impanneled and sworn by the County Court of Stanislaus County, to serve *66as grand jurors for tho term. Tliat they, and each of them, took the oath prescribed by law, that “ they would present no person through malice, hatred,, or ill-will” but tliat notwithstanding said oath, the defendants, and each of them, willfully disregarding such oath, and being actuated and influenced by a desire, and with a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Downer v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. White v. TowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Romero Arroyo v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1991
  4. United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
  5. United States v. Steve Navarro-Vargas, United States of America v. Jose Antonio Leon-JassoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API