Francesco Parisi Fwdg. Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Chief Judge:
This protest places in issue the tariff status of an article invoiced as a “Nistri Stereocomparator.” This article was classified as a surveying instrument, pursuant to paragraph 360 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Supplementary Trade Agreement with Switzerland, 90 Treas. Dec. 174, T.D. 53832, and assessed with duty at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff claims, alternatively, that it is classifiable either as laboratory apparatus in chief value of metal, pursuant to paragraph 360 of said tariff act, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Kaufman & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Smith v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marmax Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970